Here's my semi detailed comparison of the Garmin 620 (admittedly a running watch), and the Strava android app for tracking a cross country ski workout (technique: classic) at Mt Bachelor Nordic center near Bend, OR. The temperature was in the mid-upper 20s and I was using a combination of some start grip tape (under foot) with a mix of Swix blue extra, and toko red in the kick zone. The phone was in my front jacket pocket, and the watch was on my wrist (under my sleeve).
Garmin | Moto X | |
---|---|---|
Moving time | 2:32:25 | 2:30:05 |
Distance (KM) | 31.56 | 31.7 |
Avg moving speed (KPH) | 12.6 | 12.6 |
Max speed (KPH) | 50.2 | 54.0 |
Elevation gain (meters) | 613 | 664 |
The basic statistics appear to be very similar. The distance is off by about only about 1/2 percent. The average speed matches pretty much spot on. The moving time is also very close. My phone measured my top speed at 54.0, almost 4 kph more than my watch. Based on the map in Figure 1, the precision of the position on the moto x was a little noisy during downhill sections, but quickly became very good after slowing down.
Fig 1: Strava Android app recording of downhill section on blue jay loop. |
The paths really come together for the workout recorded on the phone, as they should, since I was always skiing on the same trail. Now compared to the Garmin GPS (fig 2) the data from the phone is looking pretty good. The Garmin watch seems to have a steady offset, rather than adjusting after changes in speed. By looking closely at the maps, I'm impressed how close the final numbers were for both devices.
Fig 1: The Garmin 620 on same downhill section, skied many times on same workout. |
No comments:
Post a Comment